<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nerds FTW!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A blog about nerds and life, about the nerdy life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Knight vs. Samurai: A calculated response by thedeebo</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/knight-vs-samurai-a-calculated-response/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>thedeebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=434#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Rob.  I tend to agree that the samurai as a warrior is a little overblown by popular culture.  People like to think that samurai trained all their lives and Medieval knights sat around and drank all the time.  While they did drink significantly, they weren&#039;t pushovers as you pointed out.  I still think that a knight would win most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Rob.  I tend to agree that the samurai as a warrior is a little overblown by popular culture.  People like to think that samurai trained all their lives and Medieval knights sat around and drank all the time.  While they did drink significantly, they weren&#8217;t pushovers as you pointed out.  I still think that a knight would win most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Knight vs. Samurai: A calculated response by robert murfet</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/knight-vs-samurai-a-calculated-response/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>robert murfet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=434#comment-209</guid>
		<description>ow and im sorry for the poor spelling people its very late and cant think right atm PS could some one inlighten me about then a shaumri would begin his training and what not thanks a million :) R.J.M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ow and im sorry for the poor spelling people its very late and cant think right atm PS could some one inlighten me about then a shaumri would begin his training and what not thanks a million <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  R.J.M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Knight vs. Samurai: A calculated response by robert murfet</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/knight-vs-samurai-a-calculated-response/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>robert murfet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=434#comment-208</guid>
		<description>now i am not a expert in any of these two warriors at all i have basic knowlage of ther armor weapons and the pros and cons of them, so first off a knight a knight lets say a english knight of the 15TH century or so hes big posh and british now if you look at his armor and weapons he will more that likly have a heavy weapons like a hammer a mace or a polearm maces and polearms where more the freanch and germans thing so ok hes got full place armor and a two handed warhammer.

so thats he gear out the way lets look at the knights as a person so again he will be of noble or &quot;high birth&quot; posh and well trimed. he will of course be in great shape meaning he will be a incredably fit person fast strong and skilled. he will be train to the highist order of knightly combat with a large number of different weapons from daggers all the way too huge and powerfull weapons like hammers and maces.

now people seem to have this thing for there armor being realy heavy and will slow them down a lot. ok do people know that the standard british soldiers have about twices the weight of a knights plate armor just of his torso? and trust he a train soldier and move run and fight in it with out must of a problem ok so back to the knights armor. he has aromr weighing  about 45pounds sounds a lot right well no not realy he has that weight spread over his body, i have worn some plate armor that wassent even made for some one of my size and i could move swing a sword very easy with it pluss i wassent train from the age of about 5 to use it i dident use swords weighing 3 times that of real war swords to buff up my arms for battle, so a knights trained from the age of 5 to use armor and use swords 3 time heavyer than battle ready ones would have no problem what so ever fight with it so this hole thing about knights being slow is rubbish. 

now the way armor works, (most of the time) armor is made to make the blow &quot;slide&quot; of the armor not to be super stroung and take it though it could the impact of most hits would damage the knight inside greatly,

now the saumri, so he has his swords he armor make from thin bits of iron or bambo. now again lets look at him as a person hes crazy about honor and pride two ever good triats, he is skilled with bows swodrs and spears, i dont know what age they are trained at or wether there nobility or anything, now if we were to look at a shaumris body to the knights body you will see there are  very different for one thing the white brits are bigger then most japs its just teh way we are so the kights a bigger person 2) the way a knights was ment to look was brourd sholdered and thin schomach meaning he will have the 6pack the pecks and what not a very fit man, teh shaumris body if again brourd shoulers and large stomach so hes will have a fair amoint of body fat, so the knight is a fitter man over all.

so lets compare gear the katana vs the knights fullplate armor now if swords from britian at this time could next to nothing to a knights armor what hope dose a katana have? if it weighs less and has been proven to not be much sharper then over swords of this time the knights realy dosent have much to care about. the knights or the over hand could hit the shaumri anywhere he likes he knows all to well the the hammer will splatter the shaumri easyly in one blow leaveing him dead out right or blocken up on the floor bleeding all over the place so the shaumri is a little short of places to hitthe knight again pluss one for the knight, now lets get away from this knights vs shaumri thing for a second and think about this. 

wy a knights vs a shaumri why not a british atrmy vs that of a japs army? now again there was a lot more knights than shaumri per army. so the japs main froce will be of pesent armed with a spear (probs) and no armorat all the brits pesetn will have the gearest bow even made the long bow its self would ravege the japs easy the main soldiers would be better train and better gear out than the japs so realy the japs would stand no chance againts a british army of the time, i thnk people look a the movie vertions of the shaumri and are like o my god there so cool they cant be killed they can stop bullets this there swords and can cut tanks builders anything in half and realy take it in, but with films about knights its not even true the armor never works people get hit with 1H swords and they die?? no its wouldent do anything at all a direct headshot from a swords could not play a nice game with the knights brain but he would die from in but then its not easy hitting somone trained from the age of 5 to stop you form doing so and to kill you first,

now many thanks for reading this im not trying to picks sides here its its raly hard not too when history is so onesided the knights had better gear they were trained highly and look great too XD please feel free to comment about what i have said but i must ask that we keep it mature and profetional ones again thank you for reading my post R.J.M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now i am not a expert in any of these two warriors at all i have basic knowlage of ther armor weapons and the pros and cons of them, so first off a knight a knight lets say a english knight of the 15TH century or so hes big posh and british now if you look at his armor and weapons he will more that likly have a heavy weapons like a hammer a mace or a polearm maces and polearms where more the freanch and germans thing so ok hes got full place armor and a two handed warhammer.</p>
<p>so thats he gear out the way lets look at the knights as a person so again he will be of noble or &#8220;high birth&#8221; posh and well trimed. he will of course be in great shape meaning he will be a incredably fit person fast strong and skilled. he will be train to the highist order of knightly combat with a large number of different weapons from daggers all the way too huge and powerfull weapons like hammers and maces.</p>
<p>now people seem to have this thing for there armor being realy heavy and will slow them down a lot. ok do people know that the standard british soldiers have about twices the weight of a knights plate armor just of his torso? and trust he a train soldier and move run and fight in it with out must of a problem ok so back to the knights armor. he has aromr weighing  about 45pounds sounds a lot right well no not realy he has that weight spread over his body, i have worn some plate armor that wassent even made for some one of my size and i could move swing a sword very easy with it pluss i wassent train from the age of about 5 to use it i dident use swords weighing 3 times that of real war swords to buff up my arms for battle, so a knights trained from the age of 5 to use armor and use swords 3 time heavyer than battle ready ones would have no problem what so ever fight with it so this hole thing about knights being slow is rubbish. </p>
<p>now the way armor works, (most of the time) armor is made to make the blow &#8220;slide&#8221; of the armor not to be super stroung and take it though it could the impact of most hits would damage the knight inside greatly,</p>
<p>now the saumri, so he has his swords he armor make from thin bits of iron or bambo. now again lets look at him as a person hes crazy about honor and pride two ever good triats, he is skilled with bows swodrs and spears, i dont know what age they are trained at or wether there nobility or anything, now if we were to look at a shaumris body to the knights body you will see there are  very different for one thing the white brits are bigger then most japs its just teh way we are so the kights a bigger person 2) the way a knights was ment to look was brourd sholdered and thin schomach meaning he will have the 6pack the pecks and what not a very fit man, teh shaumris body if again brourd shoulers and large stomach so hes will have a fair amoint of body fat, so the knight is a fitter man over all.</p>
<p>so lets compare gear the katana vs the knights fullplate armor now if swords from britian at this time could next to nothing to a knights armor what hope dose a katana have? if it weighs less and has been proven to not be much sharper then over swords of this time the knights realy dosent have much to care about. the knights or the over hand could hit the shaumri anywhere he likes he knows all to well the the hammer will splatter the shaumri easyly in one blow leaveing him dead out right or blocken up on the floor bleeding all over the place so the shaumri is a little short of places to hitthe knight again pluss one for the knight, now lets get away from this knights vs shaumri thing for a second and think about this. </p>
<p>wy a knights vs a shaumri why not a british atrmy vs that of a japs army? now again there was a lot more knights than shaumri per army. so the japs main froce will be of pesent armed with a spear (probs) and no armorat all the brits pesetn will have the gearest bow even made the long bow its self would ravege the japs easy the main soldiers would be better train and better gear out than the japs so realy the japs would stand no chance againts a british army of the time, i thnk people look a the movie vertions of the shaumri and are like o my god there so cool they cant be killed they can stop bullets this there swords and can cut tanks builders anything in half and realy take it in, but with films about knights its not even true the armor never works people get hit with 1H swords and they die?? no its wouldent do anything at all a direct headshot from a swords could not play a nice game with the knights brain but he would die from in but then its not easy hitting somone trained from the age of 5 to stop you form doing so and to kill you first,</p>
<p>now many thanks for reading this im not trying to picks sides here its its raly hard not too when history is so onesided the knights had better gear they were trained highly and look great too XD please feel free to comment about what i have said but i must ask that we keep it mature and profetional ones again thank you for reading my post R.J.M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Empire: Total War Campaign Multiplayer&#8230; please? by Alex</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/empire-total-war-campaign-multiplayer-please/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=651#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Very true, I have been waiting for ages with no news at all. I think the next game in the series I will just pirate to stop them getting my money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true, I have been waiting for ages with no news at all. I think the next game in the series I will just pirate to stop them getting my money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hearts of Iron II: After Action Report by Hearts of Iron II: Operation &#8220;Better Dead than Red&#8221; &#171; Nerds FTW!</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/hearts-of-iron-ii-after-action-report/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Hearts of Iron II: Operation &#8220;Better Dead than Red&#8221; &#171; Nerds FTW!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=649#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] of Iron II: Operation &#8220;Better Dead than&#160;Red&#8221;  As you may recall from my last post, the remains of the Axis war machine were being repaired by the French for their own personal use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Iron II: Operation &#8220;Better Dead than&nbsp;Red&#8221;  As you may recall from my last post, the remains of the Axis war machine were being repaired by the French for their own personal use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Empire: Total War Campaign Multiplayer&#8230; please? by thedeebo</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/empire-total-war-campaign-multiplayer-please/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>thedeebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=651#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Thedeebo concurs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thedeebo concurs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Noam Chomsky and Psycholinguistics: A Newcomer&#8217;s Rebuttal by safbeilypefaf</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/noam-chomsky-and-psycholinguistics-a-newcomers-rebuttal/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>safbeilypefaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=637#comment-200</guid>
		<description>FANTASTIC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FANTASTIC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Noam Chomsky and Psycholinguistics: A Newcomer&#8217;s Rebuttal by Poeticsoul44</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/noam-chomsky-and-psycholinguistics-a-newcomers-rebuttal/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Poeticsoul44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=637#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Very Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Very Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Noam Chomsky and Psycholinguistics: A Newcomer&#8217;s Rebuttal by fiercemudcrab</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/noam-chomsky-and-psycholinguistics-a-newcomers-rebuttal/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>fiercemudcrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=637#comment-197</guid>
		<description>lol did not notice, thx wordpress</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol did not notice, thx wordpress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Noam Chomsky and Psycholinguistics: A Newcomer&#8217;s Rebuttal by thedeebo</title>
		<link>http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/noam-chomsky-and-psycholinguistics-a-newcomers-rebuttal/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>thedeebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdsftw.wordpress.com/?p=637#comment-196</guid>
		<description>paragraphs plz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paragraphs plz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
